More density in Sammamish put on indefinite hold

May 23, 2014

By Ari Cetron

New: May 23, 12:03 p.m.

A study that could have led to more houses in Sammamish was placed on indefinite hold by the city council May 13.
A few months ago, the council called for a review of the way the city calculates density in areas zoned for one house per acre.
Right now, the city uses what’s called net zoning. Hypothetically, if there was a 10-acre plot of land, but three acres of it was unusable for a variety of reasons, the unusable land is removed from the equation. As a result, builders would only be allowed to construct seven houses.
The study would have looked at the possibility of a calculation, which, in the above scenario, would allow all 10 houses to be built.
A number of property owners have come to the city asking for the change, while residents in nearby developments have resisted it.
Susan Cezar, the city’s deputy director of development, came to the council May 13 looking for guidance on the scope of the study. There are a variety of different areas zoned for one house per acre – for a variety of different reasons – so making a wholesale change like this could have different implications.
After discussion, the scope was reduced to zero.
Councilwoman Kathleen Huckabay noted there are a number of potential changes coming at the city in the coming months. In particular, she noted a possible change in federal regulations regarding stormwater. The changes are widely expected to force localities to make major revisions to their own rules, possibly curtailing some development.
“It’s too open a question at this point,” Huckabay said.
Councilman Robert Keller questioned the reason behind the zoning change. The city doesn’t need the extra density in order to meet growth targets, he noted, so he wondered why it would consider something that would increase density.
Councilman Tom Odell said he was worried about the negative impacts extra development could have on quality of life for residents.
“I’m concerned about keeping Sammamish the way it’s been for people who live here, not for people who might live here,” he said.
Councilman Don Gerend rejected Odell’s logic, noting that at some point in the past, every development was the new development.
“If people thought like that in the 1970s, his house wouldn’t have been built,” Gerend said. “I’m concerned by this attitude.”
Gerend has long been supportive of the change, and he reiterated that support.
He also opposed Huckabay’s ideas about the federal regulations, noting that if development ends up being restricted, the city might need to change its calculations to be able to meet those growth targets.
Gerend, however, was the only one who supported the study. As a result, it seems unlikely that any study of changing calculations will happen soon.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , , , ,

Comments

One Response to “More density in Sammamish put on indefinite hold”

  1. Deb Strickland on May 26th, 2014 10:56 am

    I’m pleased to hear about this building hold. Did the city council ever say no to a a new housing development? You can’t drive a mile without seeing yet another set of big houses on small lots crammed together. Oh and don’t forget all the trees that were destroyed. I read somewhere that developers have to retain 20% of the trees but from what I see they keep a few around the perimeter and destroy the rest. Who dictates the growth target and what’s wrong with minimal growth? Is the goal to double the population? Why? Is new income the only motivator? With miniscule commercial shopping the vast majority of residents are always driving somewhere else. I’m sure that problem could be solved if the city council wanted to but it’s so much easier to say yes to every housing development.

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.