City Council praises plan for Klahanie transfer

April 15, 2014

By Ari Cetron

Members of the Sammamish City Council took turns praising a deal to transfer the Klahanie Annexation Area from Issaquah to Sammamish during the council’s April 8 meeting.

Members not only seemed to like the deal, but also hoped it would usher in a new spirit of cooperation with Issaquah after some tense disputes over the past few months.

City Manager Ben Yazici formally presented the deal to the council last week. Details of the plan had been released April 4 (see sidebar).

The Klahanie Annexation Area is about two square miles and home to more than 10,000 people. County growth plans envision it becoming part of a city. Current plans would only allow Issaquah to annex the area.

But on the Feb. 11 ballot, only 49.5 percent of Klahanie voters approved joining Issaquah. As a result, Issaquah is planning to give up the area, paving the way for it to become part of Sammamish.

Yazici praised Issaquah for working so quickly to hash out the terms of the deal. He noted that the election was Feb. 11 and now, six weeks later, Issaquah is ready to move.

“That is light speed in government in general terms,” Yazici said.

In negotiations surrounding the deal, which Yazici said were sometimes “intense,” neither Sammamish nor Issaquah got everything they wanted.

Issaquah is going to have to work quickly to be able to release Klahanie from its plan by the end of the year. And Sammamish is going to have to make a commitment to fixing Issaquah-Fall City Road, setting aside $3 million as a start.

Yazici said he expects the project to end up costing a lot more, but the amount should be enough to get started on design aspects and qualify for grants and matching funds from state and federal agencies.

The deal

If approved in its current state, the deal calls for Issaquah to take necessary steps to relinquish the Klahanie area by the end of 2014.
The cities agreed to make a joint effort before the necessary King County boards in advocating for moving the area from Issaquah to Sammamish, and to cooperate in fending off any legal challenges to the move.
In exchange, Sammamish agrees that it will support Issaquah’s effort to be designated as an urban center by the county’s Growth Management Planning Council, and as a regional growth center by the Puget Sound Regional Council.
Sammamish agrees that it will not take the state’s retail sales tax credit to which it would be entitled after the annexation.
Sammamish also agrees to expedite its promised repairs to Issaquah-Fall City Road. Within six months of annexation, the cities will agree on the scope and timing of the project.
Sammamish agrees that within one year of annexing the area, it will set aside $3 million for preliminary design work on the road. Sammamish will also amend its transportation plan to make fixing that road one of its top four road projects.
Sammamish will then begin to seek state and federal grant funds, and Issaquah will support that effort.
Sammamish also acknowledges it will benefit from the study Issaquah completed, related to its own effort to annex the area, and agrees to pay $30,000 to Issaquah for the use of that study and any background information associated with it.

Councilwoman Nancy Whitten said she wasn’t too happy that support for the Central Issaquah Plan was part of the deal. However, she said, making the overall deal and trying to patch up relations with Issaquah was more important.


Friends again

Each Sammamish council member took turns praising the Issaquah City Council and Issaquah government. Whitten called it “a very constructive, positive step for working constructively with Issaquah.”

The cities had been at odds in past months over a series of issues. Issaquah had a plan to filter stormwater near a pump that provides water to many Sammamish residents, causing concerns that the water could be contaminated. Issaquah has backed off from that plan and resolved the issues with the local water district.

Also, a plan for funding Eastside Fire & Rescue had caused some tension between the cities as the previous funding model had Sammamish effectively subsidizing fire and emergency services for Issaquah. A new model reduces the subsidy while retaining the regional fire department.

Klahanie itself had also caused some bad blood. Both cities spent the months leading up to the February election trying to woo Klahanie residents. Sammamish took other steps, even convincing a state lawmaker to introduce a bill, which was later dropped, that would have poisoned Issaquah’s attempt at annexing Klahanie.

All that is water under the bridge, said the council.

“The real key here is we’re repairing our relationship with Issaquah,” said Councilwoman Kathleen Huckabay.

Councilman Don Gerend also noted the agreement helps Sammamish keep its promise to fast-track its plan to annex the Klahanie area.

However, even the fast track will likely be pretty slow.

The Sammamish City Council is likely to approve the deal at its April 15 meeting, with Issaquah set to do the same the following week.

Even after that, the plan will need to follow three parallel tracks. Each city will need to update its Comprehensive Plan, and King County will need to update its plans as well. Five separate public entities will need to take some sort of action before the change can take place.

Some of those actions require notice periods and windows for possible appeals during which little else can happen. Only after all the hoops have been jumped through can Sammamish place the annexation on a ballot for Klahanie voters, a process that will likely stretch well into next year.

“It’s going to be a long process,” Councilman Robert Keller said.

Bookmark and Share


Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.