Issaquah to explore releasing all of Klahanie annexation area

April 2, 2014

By Peter Clark

New: April 2, 11:14 a.m.

The Issaquah City Council wants to take a step back from a piecemeal annexation of parts of the Klahanie area.

The council on March 10 asked for a brief view of editing Issaquah’s potential annexation area to only include the southern areas of the Klahanie region, reflecting districts that showed the most support for joining Issaquah in the Feb. 11 election. During the March 25 council meeting, City Long Range Planning Manager Trish Heinonen presented the findings.

“This boundary would have a lesser impact on our responsibility,” she said. “It would be just like a new subdivision.”

Heinonen said the investigated boundary would include 530 homes, about 1,500 people and 5.36 road miles.

Council discussions previously revolved around the possibility of releasing the majority of the city’s potential annexation area and retaining those southern districts.

In order to do so, the council would need to update its comprehensive plan, which it plans to do by June 2015. Council is expected to decide on the docket of proposed updates to the plan during its April 7 regular meeting.

However, after the presentation, council members expressed a wish to see broader options for the region.

“It seems to me like we could fine tune these details, but my own assessment is that we really wouldn’t alter this preliminary study,” Council President Paul Winterstein said of Heinonen’s presentation. “However, I think that what’s been missing so far is we don’t have any information about other ways that Issaquah and our neighbors could benefit from a different course of action.”

He said the council was looking at the issue from a 1,000-foot level and wanted to look at it from 10,000-feet.

“What would happen if we gave up the entire potential annexation area?” Winterstein asked rhetorically.

The city of Sammamish has publicly shown interest in annexing the area and the Sammamish City Council committed to solving transportation problems along surrounding roadways.

Winterstein said Issaquah’s council should explore how that would affect everyone involved.

“I’d like to set aside the question of annexation of just the southern portion,” he said. “If a better Issaquah-Fall City Road contributes to a better Sammamish, then that means a better Issaquah.”

To sum up the council’s wishes, Winterstein called for discussions to begin between the neighboring cities.

“I’d like for our mayor to immediately start friendly talks with the Sammamish mayor to explore ways we can all benefit about Issaquah giving up the entire potential annexation area,” he said.

He asked for the council to hear back about talks soon and expected the council to discuss the matter again during its April 7 meeting.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , ,


Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.