State park proposals have merits, limits

September 25, 2013

By Administrator

Washington State Parks needs to seek specific Requests for Proposals for improvements to Lake Sammamish State Park, the jewel at the southern end of Sammamish.

Earlier this month, State Parks and the city of Issaquah received only three proposals in response to its call for RFPs. The two agencies were trying to get outside-the-box ideas that add to Lake Sammamish park’s bottom line as well as help the city’s economic development.

The three each have merits.

• Anthony’s wants to build a lakefront restaurant. This is not outside the realm of possibilities given the park’s 2007 master plan. Many people have mentioned they would like a nice dining spot on the water, and Anthony’s knows how to do it well. Further, a restaurant brings visitors year around; attendance at the state park is slim in winter months.

• The Issaquah Soccer Club wants to upgrade its state park fields with artificial turf. The idea has come up before and has some ecological hurdles to clear — including drainage near wetlands and night lights — but the soccer club appears poised to address the concerns. More players, more tournaments add to nearby economic vitality.

• A consortium of Seattle businesspeople submitted a massive re-write of the park’s master plan. Their plan is too aggressive, calling for a lodge and restaurant near the boat launch, many more ball fields, a sports arena and athletic training facility, an amphitheater — and a lot less open space. The Hans Jensen Youth Camp would become a mountain bike park. While the development is ambitious and would be a regional attraction, we’d be effectively losing a state park. The plan is meant to make the park self-sufficient, but it already is, although revenue goes to the general fund.

While the merits of these three proposals are being considered, we’d like to see state parks seek specific RFPs, primarily for an operator of the RV/tent/yurt campground as outlined in the master plan, and for food services for the new café-concession to open in 2014.

The master plan was completed in 2007. What are Washington State Parks waiting for?

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: ,

Comments

One Response to “State park proposals have merits, limits”

  1. Charles LeDog on October 2nd, 2013 6:43 pm

    The third proposal actually mirrors the 2007 Master plan quite closely, with the added benefit of providing a means to pay for the restoration, preservation, and on-going maintenance of the Park. It also stops the State from disinvesting in the State Park – the financial surplus developed under the 3rd option stays in the park and is not sent to Olympia.

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.