City Council hears specifics on demographics, economic challenges

May 17, 2013

By Ari Cetron

New: May 17, 2:19 p.m.

Sammamish leaders already knew that the city was unusually youth and family oriented. Now they have the numbers to back it up.

Chris Mefford of consulting firm Community Attributes, made the latest in a series of presentations to the City Council’s Economic Development Committee May 14 on an economic study his firm is conducting.

Among the latest round of data Mefford presented information about the relative ages of residents and family size. Almost one-third of the city’s population is under 18. But then, there’s a big dip in the curve. Sammamish has a low number of people in their 20s and early 30s, Mefford said.

Along the same vein, he noted there is a dearth of the one- or two-bedroom apartments and condos in the city, where people in that age group would be most likely to live.

Mefford wondered aloud about the reasoning there. Whether people that age would want to live here, and there’s no opportunities to do so, or if there’s limited options because people that age don’t want to live in Sammamish.

Councilmembers at the meeting seemed accepting of that demographic bubble. They note that once those younger people start having families, they look to live in Sammamish.

Fifty-six percent of Sammamish families have children in the house, compared to King County as a whole, which has 29 percent. About 40 percent of Sammamish households have four or more people, compared to 20 percent in King County as a whole, Mefford said.

Once people move in and start having children, Mefford noted, they keep having children. He said the city may have the highest family size in the state. For now though, the city doesn’t really have the sorts of entertainment options that twenty-somethings are after, and city leaders seemed comfortable with that.

“I don’t think we want night clubs or night life,” said Councilwoman Nancy Whitten.

The city is also generally wealthier and better educated than the county as a whole, according to Mefford’s data. The median income is 60 percent higher that the county, and the percentage of residents with a bachelor’s degree or higher is 50 percent higher than the county.


Who works here?

Mefford then went on to take a deeper look at Sammamish’s employment picture. According to a host of data sources, Mefford said there are 21,400 people in Sammamish who work. Of those, 20,700 work outside the city. According to the math, that means only 700 people live and work in Sammamish. Of the 4,600 jobs located in Sammamish, 3,900 are filled by people who live outside the city, Mefford said.

“Most people who work here don’t live here,” he said.

Mayor Tom Odell noted that many jobs in Sammamish are service industry jobs, such as retail or restaurant employment. People in those jobs are unlikely to make enough to afford to live in the city, Odell said.

He though the city should try and find ways to increase the amount of office space so that professionals, maybe those who already live in Sammamish, could have places to work as well.

Enticing more Sammamish residents to work on the plateau would likely reduce traffic, and could also help local businesses since there would be more customers around on the plateau during the day.

Mefford said this sort of dynamic might mean there’s a space for co-working, where a group of small businesses can share an office space.

Even with these added spaces, and including the office space envisioned in the Town Center plan, Sammamish is likely to retain its character as a bedroom community, Mefford said.

Mefford plans to present another set of materials to the committee, including a draft plan for possible actions to the committee June 11. The final version of the plan is due to go to the whole City Council in late October. It would then be up to the council to act on the plan.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , , ,


2 Responses to “City Council hears specifics on demographics, economic challenges”

  1. mike on May 18th, 2013 8:53 pm

    Why is the council discussing this instead of just being required by the GMA to create units of housing priced and sized to fit all different points of population?

    The GMA is a joke.

  2. Michael Sullivan on May 18th, 2013 11:32 pm

    I am 28, single (though engaged), live in Sammamish, and own one of those rare townhouses mentioned in the article.

    There are a few reasons why I chose to live here. First, it’s (relatively) close to Overlake where I work, and not nearly as congested or crowded as Redmond, Issaquah, or Kirkland. I hate city living so I have no interest in moving to Seattle. Crime is almost non-existent here. Perhaps related to that, there are almost no apartments here, meaning that people who live here have made a financial commitment to staying here, which results in a more stable city with people that are actually interested in caring for it.

    I also wanted to live somewhere that tended to be a bit more conservative on the political scale. While Sammamish isn’t Texas, it certainly is far more moderate than nearly every other community west of here.

    So yes, while Sammamish isn’t a traditional choice for someone in their late 20s, it was the right choice for me. I’m not sure I’d stay though if I were to upgrade to a house, as the pricing is a bit out of my league for what I’d want. It seems like you’re stuck with a postage stamp lot unless you want to fork over three quarters of a million dollars.

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.