City cautious about taking density from county

April 25, 2013

By Ari Cetron

New: April 25, 9:51 a.m.

King County is trying to entice Sammamish with a bit of money to build more homes, but city leaders seem lukewarm to the idea at the April 9 City Council meeting.

Under a new state law, the county and city can enter into an agreement under a program called “Land Conservation Local Infrastructure Program.”

Under the program, Sammamish would accept some extra development transferred from outside of the city under a Transfer of Development Rights (see sidebar) program.

In exchange for accepting those extra housing units, the city could then get up to 75 percent of the county’s portion of property taxes, said Darren Greve of King County.

The exact amount works on a sliding scale. The more development the city accepts, the more money it can get from the county.

If Sammamish is willing to accept 215 development rights, they could net a bit more than $4 million over 25 years, Greve said. Sammamish has already agreed to accept up to 75 development rights from the county. Those 75 would be part of the 215, meaning the city could take up to 140 more.

That money would then be earmarked for infrastructure projects in and around Town Center.

City officials were skeptical from the start.

City Manager Ben Yazici said he was grateful the county was willing to adopt this program and noted the significant budgetary hit the county would take.

Greve acknowledged that if every city in King County adopted the program, the county would have problems. But he said preserving open spaces in rural areas was worth it in the long term, and it could help reduce rural road costs.

The dollar amount also raised eyebrows with city officials. Yazici noted that the city has a hard time building a mile of sidewalk for less than $1 million.

So an extra $4 million over 25 years wouldn’t do much to offset the cost generated by new residents.

“It’s great to have these property tax revenues, but what is the cost to us?” Yazici said.

Mayor Tom Odell echoed Yazici’s comments, saying the extra money was unlikely to be able to compensate for the increased growth.

Still Odell said he was intrigued by the idea, but suggested the city move carefully.

Consulting firm Community Attributes is studying the program’s implications for Sammamish and could present the council with a full report in May.

 

Transfer of Development Rights

Sammamish already has a transfer of development right program in place. Programs such as this are designed to protect areas of environmental or historic significance. In King County, it moves development from the rural portions of the county to areas inside the Urban Growth Boundary.

Under the program, a property owner on rural areas voluntarily gives up some or all of the development they would be allowed under their property’s zoning. For example, a 10-acre plot zoned for one house per acre would have up to 10 development rights.

Those rights are removed from the original property and then become a commodity that can be bought and sold. The buyer of one of these rights can then build more homes on their property than the zoning of that property would normally allow.

In Sammamish, the program is set up to allow up to 75 development rights to be transferred from forested land just east of Sammamish into Town Center.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: ,

Comments

2 Responses to “City cautious about taking density from county”

  1. Scott Hamilton on April 25th, 2013 5:34 pm

    We shouldn’t be taking TDRs from the county. We should be doing TDRs from within the city, from CAO/Overlay areas to the Town Center. This was proposed to the City Staff and Council a couple of years ago and it sits on the shelf.

  2. Alden Linn on April 29th, 2013 6:37 pm

    Why is the city even talking about this? TDR’s have been used with very little success anywhere in the county. Seattle has only used a handful of these. Redmond has used some only because Microsoft needed more FAR for an office building. They happen to have Billions of dollars to spend trying to figure out how to make these work.

    Rowley properties in Issaquah successfully squashed the idea of TDR’s in issaquah. They are too unpredictable. They make an offer from a developer dependant on the value of something that has no market place and thus deterministic value.

    There is no TDR exchange to go buy these things. They are vapor ware. Don’t exist and make development almost impossible.

    Don’t waste time on this City of Sammamish.

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.