Comments on: Group goes to Rachel Carson to challenge environmentalism

By: Janis

Janis — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:56:07 +0000

I saw this documentary and agree with Kay wholeheartedly. Excellent! It shows the many factual errors and scare tactics in Al Gore campaign on Global Warming. The British High Court found nine significant errors in Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth”. Here’s the movie trailer: http://www.youtube.com/user/noteviljustwrong. The movie comes out in October. I highly recommend it!!!

By: ken

ken — Tue, 26 May 2009 14:02:17 +0000

Frank, what legacy? Being the cause of 40 to 60 million deaths since 1970. mostly children. Yes I would say her and the envo-nuts have a legacy like Hitler and Stalin. By the way Great movie.

By: Dan Carruthers

Dan Carruthers — Sun, 17 May 2009 20:27:03 +0000

Frank Blau calls the film anti-science and anti-environment. Did you see the film Frank? I have not. But I do know this if you are committed to the idea of AGW then YOU are not at all concerned with science. You are a religious zelot. You are a book burning, scare monger, you are the flat earther, you and those like you have no respect for truth. In fact it is the likes of you that wil in the end cripple the environmental movement. The likes of you tried to silence the science of the early enlightment, it is you Frank and tose like you that are the enemy of knowlege, advancement and the humanity. You would have us all bow down before the lies, pay homage to liars and gove over our voise our freedom and our future to the propagandists that would rule over us. To you we say, get a life!

By: Frank Blau

Frank Blau — Sun, 03 May 2009 21:33:21 +0000

Patrick Moore is no friend to the environmentalist movement.

http://www.fanweb.org/patrick-moore/liar.html

To give this anti-science, anti-environment biased right-wing propaganda an audience at Rachel Carson is an insult to her legacy, and an affront to all of us that care so deeply about the environment in our community and the world.

By: Kat

Kat — Fri, 01 May 2009 04:48:33 +0000

This is such a poorly written article. The author ignored a basic tenet of journalism, which is to remain objective.
This was one-sided and uninformative. First of all, why was this group screening at Rachel Carson? Did they pick the school just to give a big “finger” to supporters of Rachel Carson and/or environmentalism, or was it just coincidental? And why did the Lake Washington School District allow the screening to be held at the school? Is this something approved of by the district, or are school buildings open to all community groups? Did this group pay for use of the building?
And most importantly, why did the reporter not even bother to contact local environmental groups to ask them what they thought of this film (or even the concept of the film)? Why did you not seek a single comment from someone who has a differing opinion? I know nothing about this group or the film, but just based on this article it seems as if the film is nothing more than a piece of right-wing anti-environmental propaganda that the reporter (and/or this newspaper) has bought into.

By: Kay Buccola

Kay Buccola — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:45:48 +0000

I have been to many journalistically-covered (or intentionally ignored) events in my life and I was also at this film screening. This is one of the few times in my life I’ve seen a nicely-written, unbiased report. Good job!

This film will definitely be for thinking people. Make sure to see it next fall.