New inhalers cause problems for some asthma sufferers

January 19, 2009

By David Hayes

Sherry Williams has lived with her asthma symptoms since her college days 30 years ago. She’s been putting up with her new inhaler since last July.

“I was switched to one of the new ones after I got a thing from my insurance company,” she said. “I had no choice.”

Williams, 50, used metered-dose inhalers that used chlorofluorocarbons, more commonly known as CFCs, to propel the medicine from the canister into her lungs, mostly during asthmatic emergencies. 

“I used to get really bad seasonal allergies. I took shots for years,” the plateau resident recalled. “The asthma just progressively got worse as I aged.”

Williams, one of an estimated 20 million asthma sufferers in the United States, added that through regular medications, her asthma was just getting better when the change in inhalers was mandated.

CFC inhalers were phased out after the U.S. agreed to participate in the 1987 Montreal Protocol. 

The international treaty banned substances damaging the ozone layer. Drug manufacturers since have developed “green” inhalers. Three new inhalers were developed to deliver the albuterol medication that uses a new more environmentally friendly propellant, hydrofluoroalkane, more commonly known as HFA — Ventolin, Proventil and ProAir, all approved by the Food and Drug Administration. 

Williams’ doctor Todd Freudenberger put her on Proventil. Although the new inhalers work as well or better than the old CFC delivery systems, Freudenberger admitted that there were several major issues since the implementation.

First, he said, the medication is no longer generic, which used to keep costs low.

“The old generic was about $15 or $16,” said Freudenberger, a pulmonary and critical care specialist at Overlake Hospital in Bellevue. “The newer HFAs are probably twice that.”

Some health groups are reporting the costs are as much as $60. Also, most insurance plans only cover one of the three types, Freudenberger added.

“If people tend to do better with one type over another, then that just adds hoops they have to jump through to get the one best for them,” he said.

Users have also expressed concerns that the new propellant delivers the medication in a softer puff, he said. So, many patients feel like they’re not getting the correct prescribed amount. 

“I have to reassure them they are getting the right medication amount. The HFA works probably as good or better than the old CFCs,” Freudenberger said.

Proper use of the HFA inhalers is also causing problems. The new ones have to be primed first, spraying up to as many as four quick spurts into the air, if they haven’t been used in a couple of weeks. Also, they carry a larger risk of clogging.

“If you don’t clean them regularly, they won’t dispense properly,” Williams said. “I carry one in my purse and in my car for emergencies. If I don’t take them out and clean them, then they won’t give out the right amount.”

Finally, Freudenberger said many patients can’t tell when the new inhalers are actually empty. With the CFC inhaler, patients could get a good feel for when there was still medication in the container. 

“If you moved them back and forth, you could hear if any medication remained,” he said. “Also, you could put it in water. If it floated, it was empty.”

You can’t do either with the HFAs. When the medication is spent, there still remains some propellant. 

One of the containers, Ventolin, actually comes with a counter that helps patients keep track of how much is left. But again, not all insurance companies pay for Ventolin.

Like many asthmatics, Williams said she isn’t convinced the change was needed in the first place.

“I certainly care about the ozone layer, but I think breathing is more important to me,” she said. “Plus, I don’t like the fact they crammed the switch down our throats. But I deal with it.”

Reach Reporter David Hayes at 392-6434, ext. 237, or dhayes@isspress.com. Comment on this story at www.SammamishReview.com.

Comments

3 Responses to “New inhalers cause problems for some asthma sufferers”

  1. Ronda on February 10th, 2009 12:34 pm

    I’m also an asthmatic, and VERY unhappy with the new medication. I’ve been switched to Proair, and am having a very difficult time breathing. I actually was forced to go on Prednisone, my breathing was so bad.

    My pharmacist said he’s been getting many complaints.

    I was wondering if it’s any use to let the proper people know that this is a big issue for us, and to whom.

  2. steve cyrus on May 15th, 2009 4:21 am

    These new asthma inhalers cost 3 times what the cost of the old inhalers were. They only dispense 200 inhalations. Why can’t they make the containers hold twice as much medication? The medication they dispense is an old medication (Albuterol) which is not expensive. How much more would it cost to make the container hold twice as much medication? Maybe a few dollars? Come on! We are people who are suffering from a medical condition that is expensive. We just have a hard time paying more and more for less and less. As for the CFC’s the old system used, as contributing to the polluting our air, think about the jet airplanes flying through our atmosphere spewing tons of crap into the air. To fill the fuel tanks of ONE airplane requires 45,000 gallons of fuel. Multiply that by hundreds of flights per day. Do they really think that our little cans of inhalents are going to destroy our ozone compared to MILLIONS of spent fuel spewed into our atmosphere? There are 20 million asthma suffers in America. If half of them used ProAir inhalers, that would amount to about a 9 foot cube of inhalers per day. 45,000 gallons of jet fuel would amount to a 40 FOOT CUBE OF FUEL. And that is only ONE FLIGHT.
    There are 20 million asthma suffers in this country. If half of them used Albuterol inhalers that would amount to THE USE OF 10 MILLION INHALERS PER MONTH. I use THREE inhalers per month. At the rate of one inhaler per month, this amounts to 400 million dollars PER MONTH. Divided by maybe 6 pharmaceutical companies who sell these inhalers. That amounts to 66 MILLION dollars a month. Quite a nice profit margin! Us asthmatics are getting screwed every day.
    email me if you want: cyrusthevirusx@hotmail.com

  3. New inhalers leave patients breathless | dv8-designs on June 13th, 2009 4:41 pm

    [...] The change to HFAs was not well-publicized, and many patients and doctors were taken by surprise. Proper use of the HFA inhalers is also causing problems. The new ones have to be primed first, spraying up to as many as four quick spurts into the air, if [...]

Got something to say?